620 comments
janalsncm · 126 days ago

Show replies

ncr100 · 125 days ago
Awesome news.

In my experience, Mismanagement, both in personnel and compensation, seems to be commonplace, as corporations seek to lower costs in response to our changing economy. Corporations looking to find an advantage may shortchange employees, overwork them, and not train managers but rather expect everybody to "just work well together", deflecting responsibility.

Unionizing provides a relief valve where unions can strongly argue for better working environments. The individual no longer has to have a half-baked idea and be afraid to raise it, for fear of retribution or simply for fear of being proven to be an impotent cog mating to a very large wheel.

Show replies

ThinkBeat · 126 days ago
This is a great time for it, with the election on and the millions running into the pocket of mass media.

NYT should be highly motivated to negotiate a deal as soon as possible.

Show replies

aleph_minus_one · 126 days ago
It is not clear to me whether going on a strike is a good idea for the New York Times tech workers:

Since media is not a sector that has high margins, when a company gets under pressure to have to increase the salaries (e.g. by strikes), the management better starts to analyze how you can reduce the number of, in this case, tech workers because with thin margins, budging in these negotiations is much more dangerous for the mere existence of the business than if the margins are high.

Instead of going on strike, it would in my opinion be a better idea for the tech workers to look for a better paid job in an industry with higher margins.

Show replies

marxisttemp · 125 days ago
Let’s all remember that the vast majority of programmers are not mathematicians, nor logicians, nor authors, we are tradespeople. And you’ll notice that tradespeople in almost every other industry unionize.

Show replies