Ask HN: Recruiters, why do you repost jobs with 1000 applications a month later?
30 points ·
charliebwrites
·
You can see from the application data that each role that's been reposted already has hundreds of applicants, which implies that it did last month as well.
Why would you repost a role vs just going through the 1000 applications you received last time?
What is the reasoning there?
gregjor ·71 days ago
Not really a new practice, but having job postings and job searching online makes it more obvious. Running ads for jobs the employer may not fill has few downsides and doesn't cost much.
Digging through job postings and applying to them has turned into a numbers game, and an arms race of automation and now AI tools. I suggest a more effective job hunting strategy, because worrying about ghost job postings just wastes your time if you intend to find a job.
Show replies
phendrenad2 ·71 days ago
This is why I don't look for jobs on LinkedIn, it's the garbage heap of false optimism.
bojo ·71 days ago
One of the answers was (paraphrased), "because we're constantly recruiting for that title, but maybe not the same team." I'm not sure if that was a good or bad sign. Growth? Or constant turnover? Really makes you wonder.
I manage a highly stable tier 2 software team embedded in enterprise, and only recruit maybe once every ~2 years, if that. Hard to relate to what is going on these days.
Show replies
leros ·69 days ago
Is this messed up and totally broken? Yes. Is it how many recruiters operate? Unfortunately, yes.
bob_theslob646 ·70 days ago
> "It is possible that state laws have posting requirements for employers awarded state government contracts. "
https://www.shrm.org/topics-tools/tools/hr-answers/regulatio...